 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,097 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 30 April 2024 by Ldm1954 (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
Comment: This article needs a major rewrite to conform to Wikipedia guidelines. Some, maybe not all:* The second paragraph should be merged into the 1st as the lead.* Remove the advertising about Martin Jarrold, completely inappropriate. All of it.* Provide facts, don't sell the technique.* Provide better links to other established MS.* Provide 1-3 figures.* Remove other WP:PEACOCK. Ldm1954 (talk) 23:53, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Therer are some unclear passages such as "The frequency at which the ions oscillate undergo a fourier transform which allows for accurate characterization with minimal error " or "Orbitrap mass spectrometers". Suggested to simplify the article and remove content that doesnot have inline citation. nirmal (talk) 07:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Charge Detection Mass Spectrometry (CDMS), a variant of mass spectrometry measures both m/z and charge, affording determination of the mass of ions in a sample. It is an advanced analytical technique used in the field of mass spectrometry. It's particularly powerful for analyzing very large molecules, such as proteins and polymers, with high precision. In CDMS, individual molecules are captured in a trap and then subjected to an electric field. As the molecules move within this field, their charge state is detected with extreme accuracy, often down to single charges. This information about the charge states can then be used to determine the mass of the molecules, providing detailed insights into their structure and composition. CDMS has found applications in various fields including biochemistry, pharmaceuticals, and materials science.