Draft:Michael K. Hole

Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 4 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,106 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · Michael K. Hole (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Bing, Wikipedia) · Submitted 2 months ago by Sbreinoe (talk: D · +) · Last edited 0 seconds ago

Submission declined on 5 March 2021 by Sulfurboy (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Sulfurboy 3 years ago. Last edited 0 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

• Comment: does not need a complete rewrite, just
  1. Remove the details about his early life. Nothing beforethe doctorate is really significant.
  2. Make sure the article contains, the full sequence of degrees and positions, with dates.
  3. Add a complete list of books published, with year, date, publisher, ISBN (referenced to WorldCat), and links to published reviews of the books; and the 5 or so most cited peer-reviewed articles, given in full with coauthors, full name of journals, and links, with the number of citations to each of them; any national level awards--(not junior awards or awards from their own university). Omit others.
  3. Include only major outside positions, such as president of major national organizations, and any positions of editor-in-chief ; Membership or minor offices in most societies, and service on editorial boards, do not count for much & are better omitted.
  4. The entrepreneurship section is trivial. Greatly condense it
  5. None of the awards except possibly no.3. means much. Remove them.
  6. The advocacy section gives no indication that any of this was significant or widely reported. Condense or remove DGG ( talk ) 04:32, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

• Comment: Subject might pass via WP:ACADEMIC, but this article would require an entire haul over. The article is an exhaustive, line by line brag on the subject that comes across more like a CV than an actual Wikipedia article. We're not interested in every little non-sequitur and achievement by the subject. Condense to what makes the subject notable and how his research has contributed to his field. Sulfurboy (talk) 09:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. (August 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Michael K. Hole (born February 1986) is an American physician, professor, entrepreneur, and military officer. He is a White House Fellow,^[1] the 2023 Austinite of the Year,^[2][3] and a Forbes 30 Under 30 honoree for North America.^[4][5] In 2019, Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush named Hole a Presidential Leadership Scholar.^[6][7]