Edict of Milan

Bust of Emperor Constantine I, Roman, 4th century

The Edict of Milan (Latin: Edictum Mediolanense; Greek: Διάταγμα τῶν Μεδιολάνων, Diatagma tōn Mediolanōn) was the February 313 AD agreement to treat Christians benevolently within the Roman Empire.[1] Western Roman Emperor Constantine I and Emperor Licinius, who controlled the Balkans, met in Mediolanum (modern-day Milan) and, among other things, agreed to change policies towards Christians[1] following the edict of toleration issued by Emperor Galerius two years earlier in Serdica. The Edict of Milan gave Christianity legal status and a reprieve from persecution but did not make it the state church of the Roman Empire[2], which occurred in AD 380 with the Edict of Thessalonica[3].

The document is found in Lactantius's De mortibus persecutorum and in Eusebius of Caesarea's History of the Church with marked divergences between the two.[4][5] Whether or not there was a formal 'Edict of Milan'  is no longer really debated among scholars, who generally reject the story as it has come down in church history.[6][1]

The version found in Lactantius is not in the form of an edict.[5] It is a letter from Licinius to the governors of the provinces in the Eastern Empire that he had just conquered by defeating Maximinus[7] later that same year and issued in Nicomedia.[1][8]

  1. ^ a b c d Frend, W. H. C. (1965). The Early Church. SPCK, p. 137.
  2. ^ The Cambridge History of Christianity - Cambridge University Press "Christianity did not become the official religion of the empire under Constantine, as is often mistakenly claimed..." https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-history-of-christianity/constantine-and-the-peace-of-the-church/1D6492CD5ECB96174AAE1221F48DC56F
  3. ^ Britanica Encyclopedia "..Emperor Theodosius I (reigned 379–395), who made Catholic Christianity the official religion of the empire.." https://www.britannica.com/topic/Christianity/The-alliance-between-church-and-empire
  4. ^ Lenski, Noel (2017). "The Significance of the Edict of Milan". In Siecienski, Edward (ed.). Constantine: Religious Faith and Imperial Policy. London: Routledge. pp. 27–56. Retrieved 21 May 2021. Differences tabulated on pp. 39–40
  5. ^ a b Cross and Livingstone. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church 1974 art. "Milan, Edict of."
  6. ^ Potter, D. Constantine the Emperor 2013 p. 148. He refers to the "Edict of Milan" as the so-called Edict of Milan in note 10 at the top of p. 329.
  7. ^ Stevenson, J. A New Eusebius SPCK 1965, p. 302
  8. ^ As David Potter states in his 2013 book Constantine the Emperor, "What is significant is that the document, once wrongly known as the Edict of Milan (there was never such a thing) and attributed to Constantine, is the product of a pagan emperor who had decided that Constantine's approach to the "Christian question" was correct. Although the 'Edict of Milan' is really a letter of Licinius to the governors of the eastern provinces, it still represents an important sea change in the direction of imperial policy." Potter p. 149

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia · View on Wikipedia

Developed by Nelliwinne