Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued February 28, 2018 Decided June 14, 2018 | |
Full case name | Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al., Petitioners v. Joe Mansky, et al. |
Docket no. | 16-1435 |
Citations | 585 U.S. ___ (more) 138 S. Ct. 1876; 201 L. Ed. 2d 201; 86 U.S.L.W. 4401 |
Case history | |
Prior | Minnesota Majority v. Mansky, 849 F.3d 749 (8th Cir. 2017); cert. granted, 138 S. Ct. 446 (2017). |
Holding | |
Minnesota's ban on political apparel at polling places violates the First Amendment's free speech clause. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Roberts, joined by Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch |
Dissent | Sotomayor, joined by Breyer |
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court concerning the constitutionality of governmental speech restrictions in a polling place venue. The case challenged a century-old Minnesota law that prevents voters from wearing clothing or items considered political while voting. While the Supreme Court previously affirmed that political campaigning near polling places may be restricted, the Minnesota law was challenged on being overbroad and violation of free speech rights under the First Amendment. The case's decision was issued on June 14, 2018, with the Court finding 7–2 that the Minnesota law was overbroad of what could be considered "political" speech, violating free speech rights and deemed unconstitutional.[1]