National Assn. of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued April 17, 2007 Decided June 25, 2007 | |
Full case name | National Assn. of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife |
Citations | 551 U.S. 644 (more) 127 S. Ct. 2518; 168 L. Ed. 2d 467; 2007 U.S. LEXIS 8312 |
Case history | |
Prior | 420 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. 2005); cert. granted, 549 U.S. 1105 (2007). |
Holding | |
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Alito, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas |
Dissent | Stevens, joined by Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |
Laws applied | |
Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act |
National Assn. of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife, 551 U.S. 644 (2007), was a United States Supreme Court case about federal jurisdiction over anti-pollution statutes.[1] Justice Samuel Alito wrote the opinion of the Court, holding that the Endangered Species Act did not require the Environmental Protection Agency to apply additional criteria when evaluating a transfer of pollution control jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. Justices John Paul Stevens and Stephen Breyer wrote dissenting opinions.