National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife

National Assn. of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife
Argued April 17, 2007
Decided June 25, 2007
Full case nameNational Assn. of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife
Citations551 U.S. 644 (more)
127 S. Ct. 2518; 168 L. Ed. 2d 467; 2007 U.S. LEXIS 8312
Case history
Prior420 F.3d 946 (9th Cir. 2005); cert. granted, 549 U.S. 1105 (2007).
Holding
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy · David Souter
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Case opinions
MajorityAlito, joined by Roberts, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas
DissentStevens, joined by Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
Laws applied
Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act

National Assn. of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife, 551 U.S. 644 (2007), was a United States Supreme Court case about federal jurisdiction over anti-pollution statutes.[1] Justice Samuel Alito wrote the opinion of the Court, holding that the Endangered Species Act did not require the Environmental Protection Agency to apply additional criteria when evaluating a transfer of pollution control jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act. Justices John Paul Stevens and Stephen Breyer wrote dissenting opinions.

  1. ^ National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife, 551 U.S. 644 (2007).

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia · View on Wikipedia

Developed by Nelliwinne