The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| Summary of results | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Question | Support | Oppose | % support | Result |
| #A1: Advertise RfAs with a site banner | 0 | 35 | 0 | Failed |
| #A2: Advertise RfAs with a watchlist notice | 85 | 12 | 88 | Passed |
| #A3: Advertise RfAs on WP:CENT | 41 | 7 | 85 | Passed |
| #B1: Disallow threaded discussion on the main RfA page | 16 | 46 | 26 | Failed |
| #B2: Limit the number of questions...by any individual editor | 82 | 24 | 77 | Passed (with conditions) |
| #B3: Limit the number of questions...of any given candidate | 1 | 34 | 3 | Failed |
| #B4: Clerking at RfA | – | – | – | Separate RfC |
| #C1: Expand discretionary range to 65% | 74 | 30 | 71 | Passed |
| #C2: Expand discretionary range to 60% | 21 | 44 | 32 | Failed |
| #C3: Expand discretionary range to 50%+1 | 0 | 27 | 0 | Failed |
| #C4: Abolish the discretionary range completely | 0 | 27 | 0 | Failed |
| #D1: Upper limits on opposition | 5 | 36 | 12 | Failed |