The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successfulrequest for adminship. Please do not modify it.
Note from closing bureaucrat: I have chosen to make a statement when closing this "RFA" to clarify my thoughts. It is my opinion that the outcome of this "RFA" is that it is an obvious success. It is reasonable for a bureaucrat to ignore votes that oppose the process but make no statement about the candidate; votes like this, while not invalid, make no statement on whether this user is still suitable to be an administrator, which is what this intended function of this process is. Ignoring such votes when determining the outcome of this "RFA" is no statement against the votes or voters themselves, as would normally be implied by ignoring a vote. Even without ignoring such votes, the percentage support lies within a range where bureaucrat discretion is encouraged.
For anyone who is interested or has any doubts, I encourage you to make a draft edit to this "RFA" where all the oppose votes which comment solely on the process are removed completely. This will hopefully resolve your doubts.
