 | This is a failed proposal. Consensus for its implementation was not established within a reasonable period of time. If you want to revive discussion, please use the talk page or initiate a thread at the village pump. |
The following is a proposal for a straightforward revamping of our Wikipedia Governance, with an eye for specifically addressing all of the core intractable problem areas that are repeatedly brought up as issues by the long-term and regular users of this website, who actively participate in matters of project governance. This is more complex, lightly, than our current system, but ultimately is very simple, and painfully so, compared to the dangerously undefined and unable to scale nature of our present non-existent governance.
Wikipedia is one of the Top 5 websites on the entire planet. We need this. We need to vigorously reject and discard the prior politics that guided this website, and the inappropriate "cults of personality" that have historically dominated many aspects of this website's governance. Wikipedia has no need of self-appointed personalities, and has a clear need of a system that de-powers any lone individuals or groups from control over specific governance areas.
The structuring of these proposals are very simple, as can be seen below.