Commissioner v. Duberstein

Commissioner v. Duberstein
Argued March 23, 1960
Decided June 13, 1960
Full case nameCommissioner of Internal Revenue v. Duberstein, et ux.
Citations363 U.S. 278 (more)
80 S.Ct. 1190; 4 L. Ed. 2d 1218; 5 A.F.T.R.2d 1626; 60-2 USTC (CCH) ¶ 9515; 1960-2 C.B. 428
Case history
PriorT.C. Memo. 1958-4; 265 F.2d 28 (6th Cir. 1959)
Holding
The court upheld the Tax court's ruling with regards to Duberstein but split as to Stanton.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas · Tom C. Clark
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr.
Charles E. Whittaker · Potter Stewart
Case opinions
MajorityBrennan
Concur/dissentFrankfurter, joined by Harlan
Concur/dissentBlack
DissentDouglas

Commissioner v. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278 (1960), was a United States Supreme Court case from 1960 dealing with the exclusion of "the value of property acquired by gift" from the gross income of an income taxpayer.[1]

It is notable (and thus appears frequently in law school casebooks) for the following holdings:

  • When determining whether something is a gift for U.S. federal income tax purposes, the critical consideration is the transferor's intention. This is a question of fact that must be determined on a "case-by-case basis". The body that levies the tax must conduct an objective inquiry that looks to "the mainsprings of human conduct to the totality of the fact of each case." On review, the trier of fact must consider all of the evidence in front of it and determine whether the transferor's intention was either disinterested or involved:
    • Gifts result from "detached and disinterested generosity" and are often given out of "affection, respect, admiration, charity or like impulses".
    • Contrast payments given as an "involved and intensely interested" act.
  1. ^ Commissioner v. Duberstein, 363 U.S. 278 (1960).

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia · View on Wikipedia

Developed by Nelliwinne