Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Simmonds | |
---|---|
Argued November 29, 2011 Decided March 26, 2012 | |
Full case name | Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Vanessa Simmonds |
Docket no. | 10-1261 |
Citations | 566 U.S. 221 (more) 132 S. Ct. 1414; 182 L. Ed. 2d 446; 80 U.S.L.W. 4269 |
Case history | |
Prior | 638 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2010); cert. granted, 564 U.S. 1036 (2011). |
Subsequent | On remand, 678 F.3d 1139 (9th Cir. 2012). |
Holding | |
Normal equitable tolling principles apply to the statute of limitations for lawsuits under § 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Scalia, joined by Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan |
Roberts took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
Securities Exchange Act, 1934 |
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Simmonds, 566 U.S. 221 (2012), is a United States Supreme Court decision regarding the limitation period for insider trading claims.[1][2] The court ruled in an 8-0 unanimous opinion that the limitation period was subject to traditional equitable tolling. Chief Justice John Roberts recused himself from the case.