Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Simmonds

Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Simmonds
Argued November 29, 2011
Decided March 26, 2012
Full case nameCredit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Vanessa Simmonds
Docket no.10-1261
Citations566 U.S. 221 (more)
132 S. Ct. 1414; 182 L. Ed. 2d 446; 80 U.S.L.W. 4269
Case history
Prior638 F.3d 1072 (9th Cir. 2010); cert. granted, 564 U.S. 1036 (2011).
SubsequentOn remand, 678 F.3d 1139 (9th Cir. 2012).
Holding
Normal equitable tolling principles apply to the statute of limitations for lawsuits under § 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinion
MajorityScalia, joined by Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, Sotomayor, Kagan
Roberts took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
Securities Exchange Act, 1934

Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Simmonds, 566 U.S. 221 (2012), is a United States Supreme Court decision regarding the limitation period for insider trading claims.[1][2] The court ruled in an 8-0 unanimous opinion that the limitation period was subject to traditional equitable tolling. Chief Justice John Roberts recused himself from the case.

  1. ^ Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Simmonds, 566 U.S. 221 (2012).
  2. ^ Kaufhold, Steven (March 28, 2012). "Opinion analysis: Occupying the "reasonable middle ground" on tolling of insider trading claims". SCOTUS Blog. Retrieved January 31, 2013.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia · View on Wikipedia

Developed by Nelliwinne