Back رخصة إم أي تي Arabic MIT лиценз Bulgarian Llicència X11 Catalan Licence MIT Czech MIT-licensen Danish MIT-Lizenz German MIT License English MIT-permesilo Esperanto Licencia MIT Spanish پروانه ام‌آی‌تی Persian

MIT litsents

MIT litsents on tarkvaralitsents, mis pärineb Massachusettsi Tehnoloogiainstituudist (MIT),[1] kus seda hakati kasutama 1980. aastate lõpus.[2] Litsents seab tarkvara ja lähtekoodi kasutamisele väga vähe piiranguid ning on seega hästi ühilduv teiste litsentsidega.[3][4]

Erinevalt copyleft-litsentsidest nagu GNU GPL lubab MIT litsents materjali kasutamist ka omanduslikus tarkvaras tingimusel, et kõik tarkvara koopiad sisaldaksid koopiat litsentsi tingimustest ning autoriõiguse märgist.[5][6] 2015. aastal oli MIT litsents GitHubi kõige populaarsem tarkvaralitsents.[7]

Tuntud MIT litsentsi kasutavate projektide hulgas on X Window System, Ruby on Rails, Node.js, Lua, jQuery, .NET, Angular ja React.

  1. ↑ Rosen, Lawrence E. (2005). Open Source Licensing: Software Freedom and Intellectual Property Law. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR. ISBN 0-13-148787-6. OCLC 56012651.
  2. ↑ Haff, Gordon. "The mysterious history of the MIT License". opensource.com. Vaadatud 30. juulil 2019. The date? The best single answer is probably 1987. But the complete story is more complicated and even a little mysterious. [...] Precursors from 1985. The X Consortium or X11 License variant from 1987. Or the Expat License from 1998 or 1999.
  3. ↑ Hanwell, Marcus D. (28. jaanuar 2014). "Should I use a permissive license? Copyleft? Or something in the middle?". opensource.com. Vaadatud 30. mail 2015. Permissive licensing simplifies things One reason the business world, and more and more developers [...], favor permissive licenses is in the simplicity of reuse. The license usually only pertains to the source code that is licensed and makes no attempt to infer any conditions upon any other component, and because of this there is no need to define what constitutes a derived work. I have also never seen a license compatibility chart for permissive licenses; it seems that they are all compatible.
  4. ↑ "Licence Compatibility and Interoperability". Open-Source Software - Develop, share, and reuse open source software for public administrations. joinup.ec.europa.eu. Originaali arhiivikoopia seisuga 17. juuni 2015. Vaadatud 30. mail 2015. The licences for distributing free or open source software (FOSS) are divided in two families: permissive and copyleft. Permissive licences (BSD, MIT, X11, Apache, Zope) are generally compatible and interoperable with most other licences, tolerating to merge, combine or improve the covered code and to re-distribute it under many licences (including non-free or 'proprietary').
  5. ↑ "Licence Compatibility and Interoperability". Open-Source Software - Develop, share, and reuse open source software for public administrations. joinup.ec.europa.eu. Originaali arhiivikoopia seisuga 17. juuni 2015. Vaadatud 30. mail 2015. The licences for distributing free or open source software (FOSS) are divided in two families: permissive and copyleft. Permissive licences (BSD, MIT, X11, Apache, Zope) are generally compatible and interoperable with most other licences, tolerating to merge, combine or improve the covered code and to re-distribute it under many licences (including non-free or 'proprietary').
  6. ↑ "Paid software includes MIT licensed library, does that put my app under MIT too?". stackexchange.com. Vaadatud 21. juulil 2021.
  7. ↑ Balter, Ben (9. märts 2015). "Open source license usage on GitHub.com". github.com. Vaadatud 21. novembril 2015. 1 MIT 44.69%, 2 Other 15.68%
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia · View on Wikipedia

Developed by Nelliwinne