 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,528 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 4 April 2025 by Greenman (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
| Submission declined on 4 April 2025 by Aydoh8 (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Aydoh8 3 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 1 April 2025 by Aydoh8 (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by Aydoh8 5 days ago. | |
Comment: A large amount of the sources are dead links (404), some of them redirect to images and the rest seem pretty unreliable, read like PR pieces (likely SPS), have generic names and are all written by "admin". Overall I can't verify many of the claims. Possible scam? Aydoh8[contribs] 00:39, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
 Logo of Laniakea Technologies | |
| Company type | Private |
|---|---|
| Industry | Technology |
| Founded | 2021 |
| Products | Laniakea OS |
| Website | www |
Laniakea Technologies is a technology company that develops decentralized software, focusing on its operating system, Laniakea OS. It integrates blockchain and artificial intelligence (AI) into its products, targeting digital ecosystems for remote work and decentralized finance. The Laniakea app, part of this ecosystem, has been available on the Apple App Store since September 29, 2022.[1]
- ^ "Laniakea on the App Store". Apple App Store. Retrieved 2025-04-02.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.