| Submission declined on 17 June 2025 by Bunnypranav (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 16 June 2025 by Bunnypranav (talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Bunnypranav 12 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 13 June 2025 by CSMention269 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by CSMention269 15 days ago.
| |
Comment: No changes at all since last decline. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:06, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Many sources are cited, but they do not show significant coverage of the subject, and are not independant and reliable. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:31, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: 76% AI generated Theroadislong (talk) 08:12, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
| LoadGen | |
|---|---|
| Developer(s) | LoadGen B.V. |
| Initial release | 2005 |
| Stable release | 5.0
/ March 30, 2025 |
| Written in | Multiple |
| Operating system | Windows, Linux |
| Platform | Virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI), Web applications |
| Type | Load testing, Performance monitoring, GUI testing |
| License | Proprietary |
| Website | www |
LoadGen is a proprietary software suite developed by the Dutch company LoadGen B.V. for load testing, performance monitoring, and end-user simulation in virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI), web applications, and traditional desktop environments. Originally introduced in 2005, the software was created to simulate user workloads in Citrix-based infrastructure and later expanded to support technologies such as Microsoft Remote Desktop Services (RDS), VMware Horizon, and Azure Virtual Desktop (AVD).[1][2][3][4]
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
Mangan2006was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
Twiest2023was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
GOEUC2025was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
Verheij2013was invoked but never defined (see the help page).