- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:58, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Haliey Welch
- Reviewed:
- Comment: I accidentally made the page on the 11th without realizing that it was not appropriate to do so given the move discussion on the Hawk tuah page, but the discussion has now been closed with strong support for an article about Welch being created.
Converted from a redirect by
Jolielover (
talk).
Number of QPQs required:
0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.
jolielover♥talk 09:18, 14 December 2024 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Article is new enough and long enough. I'm seeing the definition of pump and dump is verbatim from the source, which gives concerns about other close paraphrasing potentially in the article. Please review and attempt to better paraphrase the materials. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:19, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- That definition was already in the pump and dump article, so I took it out myself.--Launchballer 23:55, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: I have removed that bit due to the definition not being needed, please check to see if the article is fine now. jolielover♥talk 15:17, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Jolielover, have you gone over your writing to ensure that there is no close paraphrasing? — Chris Woodrich (talk) 15:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: Yes, there is none. jolielover♥talk 16:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Alright. I've reviewed several of the sources, and aside from losing a few IQ points I didn't see anything of concern. Good to go. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 19:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Article is new enough and long enough. I'm seeing the definition of pump and dump is verbatim from the source, which gives concerns about other close paraphrasing potentially in the article. Please review and attempt to better paraphrase the materials. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:19, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
